COEPYour Health & the Environment

 

 

NEWS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, WINTER ISSUE 2006   

 

Upcoming Event: February 22, 7-9 pm 

Are lawn pesticides putting your family at risk for health problems?  Come and learn about why pesticides are harmful and what alternatives you can use on your lawn.

The Breast Cancer Coalition of Rochester, in conjunction with Community Co-sponsors Rochesterians Against the Misuse of Pesticides (RAMP) and the University of Rochester’s Department of Environmental Medicine present Patricia Wood, Founder and Executive Director of Grassroots Environmental Education, Westchester County.  This free event will take place at the Breast Cancer Coalition of Rochester, 840 University Avenue.  If you have any questions please contact the BCCR office at 473-8177.

PHTHALATES

 

What are they?  

Phthalates are a class of industrial chemicals (dialkyl or alkyl/aryl esters of 1,2 benzenedicarboxylic acid) that are often added to products people use on a daily basis. A majority of the phthalates are used as plasticizers.  Plasticizers allow plastic to be soft, strengthened, flexible, and durable.  Phthalates are also used as solvents in products such as perfume in order to extend the fragrance durability.  Human exposure to phthalates is often measured by the related metabolites ("breakdown products") of the phthalates. Phthalates are colorless oily liquids, with high boiling points and low volatility.  These characteristics make phthalates a useful additive in a variety of industrial and commercial products.  

 

 

 

 

How are you exposed to phthalates?  

 

 

Ingestion:  microwave

  • Food can absorb plasticizers from its packaging or during manufacturing

  • Toys that are made out of soft plastic and chewed on by children can leach out plasticizers

  • Water can be contaminated by phthalates from many sources

 

Inhalation:

  • Household products such as air fresheners or perfumes can off-gas phthalates  

 

Skin Absorption:

(research suggests that this is the least common exposure route)

  • Clothing made of plastic or vinyl

  • Nail polish which uses plasticizers to keep it from cracking

  • Medical tubing (infants in neonatal intensive care nurseries, dialysis patients, blood bags)  

Where can you find phthalates?

  • Vinyl flooring adhesiveShower

  • Cosmetics

  • Perfume

  • Nail polish

  • Hairspray

  • Polyvinyl Chloride(PVC)

  • Toys

  • Shower Curtains

  • Solvents

  • Air fresheners

  • Medical bags and tubing

  • Plastic Raincoats

  • Automotive plastics

  • Food packaging

 

Common Types of Phthalates:      

  • DMP, dimethyl phthalate

  • DBP, dibutyl phthalate  

  • BzBP, benzylbutyl phthalate  

  • DEHP, di-(20ethylhexyl) phthalate  

  • DINP, di-isononyl phthalate  

  • DEP, di-ethyl phthalate  

 

What is the potential harm from exposure to phthalates?

In the past, there has been little research on phthalate exposure in humans, although there have been animal studies.  This is partially due to the complications presented by human studies because of the ever-present nature of phthalates in the environment.  Humans are constantly exposed to phthalates.  It can be difficult to identify how much, what kind, and from which products phthalates present potential harm to humans.  What research exists does not give a decisive verdict on the health effects of phthalates.             

The debate about the safety of phthalates is of international concern.  One side of the dispute claims that there has been sufficient research on phthalates which has found no significant evidence that phthalates cause harm to humans.  According to the United States Food and Drug Administration- “It’s not clear what effect, if any, phthalates have on health.”  The Phthalates Information Center claims that “research suggests that health effects seen in rodents may be specific to that species, and not relevant to humans.”

On the other hand, new studies are beginning to shed light on potential human health effects of phthalate exposure.  This research has persuaded Europe to regulate phthalates based on the Precautionary Principle. (see Precautionary Actions below)

“Research suggests that exposure to phthalates can cause reproductive and respiratory health effects.” Phthalate Analysis in Household Air Freshener (A. Turner, 2004)

In fall 2005, Europe permanently banned the use of six types of phthalates (DEHP, DBP, BBP, DINP, DIDP, DNOP) that are often used in items such as toys for children.  The European Commission has begun looking at limiting the use of phthalates in medical devices.  The EU aims to use precaution while acknowledging major implications, such as displeasing major industries or creating alternatives that are more costly and less is known of them, when creating new policies.   

For More News and Information on Phthalates:

USA Today, August 2005

Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2005

Wall Street Journal, October 2005

 

San Jose Mercury News, October 200                                                                           

            Center for Reproductive Epidemiology:  Focus on Environment, Fertility, Family Health  

 

New Research Explores How Chemicals Effect Reproduction                        

 

Some evidence suggests that ubiquitous chemicals to which pregnant women might be exposed to around the time of conception or later in pregnancy may be harming the fetus, and ultimately impacting the child’s future health. To explore this question, the University of Rochester Medical Center has established a Center for Reproductive Epidemiology, which is among the first in the United States to focus on this area of research.

 

Shanna H. Swan, Ph.D., professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, is serving as Director of the Center for Reproductive Epidemiology. Swan is internationally recognized for her work on links between male and female reproduction and environmental toxins. Since 1998 she has served as principal investigator for a federally funded, multi-center Study for Future Families, an investigation into the environmental causes of geographic variations in reproductive health. Her most recently published research suggested that phthalates in a mother’s body during pregnancy had subtle effects on the development of the genitals of infant boys.

 

Swan is a first-ever recipient of the Jenifer Altman Awards, created in 2005 to honor scientists whose work promotes the protection of human and ecological health, through a commitment to science in the public interest. These scientists demonstrate a deep commitment to scientific integrity and the public’s right to know, even in the face of controversy.

 

“At the Center for Reproductive Epidemiology we will continue to focus on understanding how chemicals in our bodies affect our fertility and the outcome of pregnancy,” said Swan, who joined the University of Rochester faculty in January 2005 from the University of Missouri-Columbia. “Science is recognizing that adult diseases often originate in the womb. Animal studies have shown that exposures at the earliest stages of life may predict future health. So it is important to conduct epidemiological studies to determine whether these common exposures also impact human development and adult health.”

 

Swan and colleagues are planning a long-term study of families living in the Rochester area to better understand how phthalates and other environmental exposures can impact infant development.  

Adapted from: Leslie Orr, September 13, 2005         


Researchers Investigate Prenatal Phthalate Exposure 

Anogenital distance and prenatal phthalate exposur

Swan and Research Team Project Summary  

 

 

Swan Shanna H. Swan, Ph.D.

 

 

 

 

 

Study background  

 

We examined several androgen dependent developmental endpoints in baby boys in relation to the concentration of phthalates in their mothers’ urine. The primary outcome for our study was the anogenital distance (AGD).  

The mothers in our study participated, while pregnant, in the Study for Future Families (SFFI), which we conducted in Minneapolis MN, Los Angeles CA and Columbia MO. If a woman agreed, and the baby was 3-24 months old when we recontacted her, mother and baby were enrolled in the current study (SFFII). This study is still ongoing, and this analysis is based on data available at the end of 2004, which includes 134 mother-son pairs, of which 85 had phthalate measurements.  

 

 Anogenital Distance

            Anogenital distance (AGD) is a measurement of the length of the perineum, the length between the anus and the genitals.  It is easily measured and in rodents and humans it is about twice as long in males as females. Experiments have demonstrated that in rodent studies this distance is shortened when the mother is exposed to chemicals that are anti-androgenic, such as dibutyl phthalate (DBP) or benzylbutyl phthalate (BBzP). We hypothesized that the same was true in human boys. 

 

 

               Methods

            We invited mothers to bring their babies, if they were 3- 24 months old, to one of our clinical centers for a physical examination administered by study staff, using a protocol developed for our study. For boys this examination included measurement of AGD and development of the testicles, the penis and the scrotum. Boys with an AGD that was quite short (<25% of expected) for their age and weight were classified as having short AGD.

           Urine samples provided by some mothers while pregnant were analyzed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for nine phthalate metabolites.  

   

            Study results

 We found that:

  • Boys’ AGD was significantly (and inversely) associated with the concentration of metabolites of four commonly used phthalates in their mothers’ prenatal urine.

 

  • The pattern of genital changes seen in these baby boys is consistent with the “phthalate syndrome” previously identified in rodents prenatally exposed to phthalates.  

 

  • These changes are seen at phthalate levels below those found in one-quarter of the female population of the United States, based on a nation-wide sample.

            Prior to our study, the only studies on effects of prenatal phthalate exposure were conducted in rodents. However, two recent studies found adverse effects of some phthalates on semen quality in adult males and one study found increased rates of prematurity among infants whose mothers had high levels of one phthalate (di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate or DEHP)

 

Dr. Swan hopes to study a new group of mothers to further examine these associations.  We will also be analyzing our data to learn more about sources of mothers and babies phthalate exposure. We will be working with colleagues to examine phthalate levels in relation to prematurity and low birth weight. And we will be looking at phthalate levels in the fathers in relation to their semen quality.   


ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE NEWS ARCHIVES  

University of Rochester Receives $21 Million Terrorism Research GrantJacob N. Finkelstein, Ph.D. 

Study of Mercury and Fish to Focus on Teenagers: Thomas Clarkson, Ph.D.

The Dangerous Legacy of Lead: Michael McCabe Jr., Ph.D.

Scientists Probe Air Pollution-Heart Disease Link:  Gunter Oberdoerster, Ph.D. and Mark J. Utell, M.D.

 

TOXICOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAM NEWS 

Congratulations to alumnus (Class of 1989),George M. Gray Ph.D., for his recent appointment as the Assistant Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development.


Welcome to the students who entered the Toxicology Training Program in Fall 2005: David Adenuga, Sophia Fang, and Sam Caito.

 

In October 2005, the Department of Environmental Medicine opened the Neurobehavioral Facility Laboratory.  Dr. Troy Zarcone is the Director of the laboratory, and Dr. Bernard Weiss is the Senior Advisor.   This facility provides state-of-the-art equipment and expertise in the neurobehavioral field to researchers at the University of Rochester Medical Center.  This facility provides consultations in interpreting data on behavioral changes and helps support research that builds collaborations between scientists. 

                     

Dr. Troy Zarcone                      Dr. Bernard Weiss

 

COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS

 

 

 

 

 

Center for Science Education and Outreach

Faculty Member Presents  at World Environmental Education Congress in Torino, Italy, October 2-6 2005

 

Camille Anne Martina, Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Environmental Medicine, and David Hursh, Ph. D, Associate Professor of the Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development, presented their paper “We all live downstream: Transforming knowledge and thinking through teaching and learning about the relationship between the environment and human health” at the World Environmental Education Congress in Torino, Italy.

 

This Congress addressed diverse participants

including: university professors and researchers,

educators, politicians, scientists, technicians,

teachers, students, environmentalists, and the mass media. The objectives of the Congress were to exchange observations and best practices of environmental education at a worldwide level, to develop the main themes for the agenda on environmental education and to jointly discuss the theses and proposals presented in the speeches and posters from around the world.

 

 

 

 

Environmental Medicine Team Develops a Series of Environmental Health Education Materials for Health Care Professionals and Lay Community Audiences

Environmental Medicine faculty members William Beckett, MD, Ph.D., Dina Markowitz, Ph.D., Katrina Korfmacher, Ph.D., Camille Martina, Ph.D., and Kate Kuholski collaborated on a grant from the Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics (AOEC) during Spring and Summer of 2005.  The team developed educational materials on the heath effects of exposure to mercury, arsenic, and lead.  These materials will be used by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry to educate health care professionals and lay community audience about potentially toxic substances and other environmental health topics. 

How Does Arsenic Get into the Environment?:

Graphic by Jenny Smith of the University of Rochester Medical Center

Arsenic

 

 

Healthy Home Pilot

Katrina Smith Korfmacher received pilot funding to establish a model “Healthy Home” in southwest Rochester.  She has been working with two community groups, South West Area Neighborhood Association (SWAN) and Rochester Fatherhood Resources Initiative (RFRI) for over a year to design an interactive museum/training facility that would help families, property owners, and contractors learn in a culturally appropriate, hands-on way how to address environmental hazards in their homes.  

 

This “Healthy Home” will be established in a typical residential home in southwest Rochester.  The home will initially focus on asthma triggers, household toxins, and lead.  This is a novel approach to urban environmental health education that will have a direct impact on the environmental health of the community’s housing.  In addition, it may significantly help to prevent childhood lead poisoning, which can contribute to developmental and learning disabilities.  If successful, this facility may serve as a model for environmental health education and training throughout the country. Please contact Dr. Korfmacher if you would like more information about the healthy home or would like to be involved in the project.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get the Lead Out (GLO) Project

Outreach Project Finds Extensive Lead Hazards in Rochester Neighborhoods

An intensive outreach project in two inner-city Rochester neighborhoods has revealed that up to 88% of homes may have some form of exterior lead paint hazards. 

The event, jointly conducted by Action for a Better Community and the University of Rochester Medical Center, represents the most ambitious outreach project undertaken by the “Get the Lead Out” (GLO) project.   Sixteen community interns and staff from the University of Rochester’s Environmental Health Sciences Center conducted education, visual assessments, and resident surveys over a two-week period in July.  Homeowners, landlords, and tenants were notified in advance of the inspection visits and were provided with information about lead hazards. 

The outreach teams documented deteriorated paint in 385 homes.  Because all of these houses were built before 1978, any deteriorated paint may pose a lead hazard. 

 Over 800 Monroe County children are lead poisoned each year.  Lead poisoning is most serious for children six years and younger, potentially damaging the child’s central nervous system, kidneys and other organs.  Even low levels of lead are harmful and are associated with decreased intelligence, impaired neurobehavioral development, decreased growth and impaired hearing.  The major source of lead exposure among U.S. children is lead-based paint and lead-contaminated dust found in housing built before 1978.   Eighty-seven percent of Rochester’s housing was constructed prior to 1950.

Volunteers

Interns/Volunteers:  Veronica Siaca, Trey McCullough, Kazuko Sharp, Ann Walter,Obidi Ikpeze

Rochester City Lead Ordinance Passes Unanimously
 
Making good on the Mayor’s pledge at the Coalition to Prevent Lead Poisoning’s June 2004 Lead Summit, the Rochester City Council has passed an amendment to its municipal code requiring inspection for lead hazards.   Advocates have long recognized the need for stronger lead policy to address Rochester ’s high rate of childhood lead poisoning in the absence of a statewide primary prevention law.  With input from leading lead researchers, the Alliance for Healthy Homes, the National Center for Healthy Housing, the Centers for Disease Control and many others, the Coalition submitted proposed legislation in January 2005.  Alternative proposals were submitted by the Mayor and by a property owner group.  These various possibilities were vigorously debated over the past year. 

The final bill has several notable features:

  • Mandatory visual inspection by city inspectors of all rental housing as part of the existing Certificate of Occupancy system, under which each building is inspected every five years
  • Targeted implementation of the inspections in “high risk” areas
  • In the targeted areas, units that pass a visual inspection must also pass dust wipes
  • Everyone conducting lead hazard reduction must have Lead Safe Work Practices training
  • After work is completed, owners must obtain a clearance examination by a private lead sampling technician/risk assessor
  • A Citizens Advisory Committee will provide input into the implementation process
 The system adopted in Rochester has several nationally significant features.  The Monroe County Executive has pledged to incorporate the code’s provisions in pre move-in inspections of homes of families on public assistance.  This city-county model of primary prevention could inform national efforts to require lead safety in all TANF housing.  In Rochester’s depressed housing market, the need for financial resources to subsidize lead hazard reduction is critical.  Thus, this law makes passage of a state and federal tax credit even more urgent.  In addition, the Coalition will continue to work to bring additional funding options to help make Rochester ’s housing lead safe.

 

Community Advisory Board 

Our Community Advisory Board provides a unique forum for members of Rochester-area community organizations to discuss local and regional environmental health issues. Recent CAB meetings have featured presentations on dental health, air pollution and the connection to cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, and phthalates.  The presentation on dental health by Dr. Gene Watson and Dr. T. Kopycka-Kedzierawski of the University of Rochester’s Eastman Dental Center inspired one of the members of the Community Advisory Board to create an educational outreach project.   Dr. Hoffman Moka Lantum of Kodak, hosted a Day of Caring Event that focused on educating city residents about children's dental health.

The December meeting featured a presentation by Dr. Shanna Swan on her research on phthalates (see other articles, this issue).  

In January 2006, Dr. Andrew Doniger, Director of the Monroe County Public Health Department, and two of his colleagues made a special presentation on the Monroe County Environmental Health Report Card to CAB as well additional graduate students and faculty members from the University of Rochester Medical Center.

Precautionary Actions Regarding Phthalates and Other Plasticizers

Shanna H. Swan, Ph.D.

Consumers and journalists often ask me about precautionary measures I would recommend (or use myself) to limit exposure to phthalates and others plasticizers of concern. Some recommendations are summarized here.

 

 

As stated on the National Library of Medicine (NIH) website (http://toxtown.nlm.nih.gov/text_version/chemical.php?name=phthalates), “You can be exposed to low levels of phthalates through air, water, or food. You can be exposed to phthalates if you use cosmetics, personal care products, cleaning products, or other plastic and vinyl products that contain them. Exposure to low levels of phthalates may come from eating food packaged in plastic that contains phthalates, or breathing dust in rooms with vinyl miniblinds, wallpaper, or recently installed flooring that contain phthalates. You could be exposed by drinking water that contains phthalates, though it is not known how common that is. Children can be exposed to phthalates by chewing on soft vinyl toys or other products made with them. Children can be exposed by breathing household dust that contains phthalates, or using IV tubing or other medical devices made with phthalates”.

 

 

In other words, the sad truth is that virtually all of us are regularly exposed to low levels of phthalates and other plasticizers. But there are some measures we can take to avoid at least some of these exposures, until the time when the use of these chemicals in everyday materials and products is more aggressively restricted.

 

 

Unfortunately, since these chemicals are so pervasive in our environment it is unclear what precautionary

measures are most effective in reducing risk. Food is probably a large source, but it is not possible to know when phthalates are present. As a precautionary action, choose microwave-safe plastic wrap, and never let it directly contact food. In fact, you can avoid using plastic wrap—try waxed or parchment paper instead. If possible, choose containers made of polyethylene, which is plasticizer-free. Otherwise, you can use microwaveable glass and ceramic cookware. Don’t microwave plastic containers used for cold food storage—they often melt and warp, because they are not designed to withstand the high heat of microwaving. Also, it is probably safer to avoid microwaving food in freezer cartons or on Styrofoam trays. If in doubt, choose food containers with recycling codes #1, #2, #4 or #5. Avoid those with #7 (PC or polycarbonate) and #3 (PVC or polyvinyl chloride).

 

 

Only one phthalate (diethylhexyl phthalate) is regulated in drinking water, and even that chemical may be

present at higher than permissible levels if levels fluctuate, since water is tested only intermittently. That may be of concern for couples trying to get pregnant, or during pregnancy, when the time around and the weeks after conception are most critical. And other phthalates are not regulated at all. So consumers may decide to use a home water treatment method. The recommended method to remove phthalates from drinking water is with a granular activated carbon (GAC) filter. There are no regulatory requirements for phthalates. The National Resources Defense Council tested a number of brands of bottled water and some, but not all, contained phthalates (http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/bw/exesum.asp).

 

 

Children can be exposed to phthalates by chewing on soft vinyl toys or other products made with them. Parents may want to dispose of all teethers, pacifiers, nipples and heavily mouthed toys made of soft plastic, unless they know them not to contain phthalates. Parents may also want to dispose of all clear, shiny plastic baby bottles, unless the manufacturer states they are not made of polycarbonate, primarily because of concerns about the plasticizer bisphenol-A.

 

 

The European Union has imposed a ban on three types of phthalates in all children’s products, and has banned three other types from use in mouthing products marketed for children under three. California is currently considering a similar ban. Several phthalates are contained in personal care products, and some companies have removed some or all phthalates from their products. More information about specific products can be found at http://www.nottoopretty.org. Consumers, particularly pregnant women or couples attempting to conceive, may want to limit their use of phthalate-containing personal care products. Additional precautionary actions include asking for phthalate-free medical care, checking pharmaceutical labels for presence of phthalates and, when building or remodeling, avoiding PVC (vinyl) materials that will add phthalates to indoor environments.

 

 

While the risks from these products have not been established, these precautionary actions cannot be harmful, and it is likely they will reduce exposure to plasticizers, a class of chemicals now under intense scrutiny because of increasing evidence of their toxicity.